People seem to get busier every day. We need fast and easily delivered information, we can’t waste time with long texts and many don’t have time –or patience- for the words. We can be sorry for the last ones, but the truth is that, even more than ever, we live in a visual world.
If a picture is worth a thousand or ten thousand words, it can be said that a piece of travel writing without photography has become something impossible to imagine. However, does any shot do the job of talking for itself? I believe that the principles applied for travel writing also count for travel photography.
We should avoid the clichés, capture the unexpected showing reality through new angles and be very careful when using Photoshop (are we going to take the documentary or the PR angle?).
My own good and bad examples, on the broad subject “Rome”.
Who still needs to see this kind of picture on a travel piece?
What about these ones? What do they say?
(* don't touch me)
I couldn’t finish this post without mentioning National Geographic’s pioneering work on travel photography. It has inspired travel photographers around the world since the advent of photography, in the C19th.
Photo: en.wikipedia.org (Machu Picchu, published in the National Geographic in 1911)


